Consent

[Jurdex]

A possible new command?

WhoConsent

Verarb is consenting you.
Jhorr is consenting you.
Touk is consenting you.
Kazibblie is consenting you.


This would avoid those annoying "damnit, wtf wasn't consenting me??" drag deaths.

Also, would it be difficult to make a command called gconsent? Meaning it would be a consent specifically designed for grouping via consent. Its just sometimes annoying when you need to consent people for group but another person for drag or while doing resses and unintentionally grouping a bunch of people?

Dornax
Jurdex

[Gormal]

Amen. Just make 'consent' without an argument show who You are consenting and who is consenting you.

[Zrax]

woohoo good idea

[izarek]

two thumbs up

[Thrand]

Now that a goodie has sugested it maybe it will get implemented. *giggle*

Ezza

[Corth]

I like the idea.. Can't think of any reason why someone shouldn't have this information readily available to them. As an alternative, a message sent to you when someone has withdrawn their consent would also do the trick.

Corth

[Dalar]

http://www.sojourn3.org/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000329.html

yea i wrote it in a hurry so it doesn't sound right.

Would be great if we had the following:
make consent in bright green so people can see who is consenting you.

add a message when you lose a person's consent.

have multiple consents, so u can consent leader and multiple clerics

have consent with no parameters to list who is consenting you.

[Trewe]

Related to consent

I was thinking this a few months back that we should be able to drag incompacitated pc's out of a room aswell.. I've died trying to bandage a person while a dragon was breathing all over the place..
It'd be more realistic to think I would drag them out of danger before I tried to bandage them..

Azder *Has his first aid certificate* Darkstar

[This message has been edited by Trewe (edited 10-27-2001).]

[Vipplin]

Yes this has been brought up before as a good idea. It still is, and there are some good new twists to the old ideas here. Implement all! Including dragging incap ppl if you have their consent.

Vadian consents everyone in the world! Wait, not you...

[Glorishan]

I agree with Dornax's ideas about consent, as well as the ideas about dragging incap people. Think about how much fun we could have dragging incapped people out of deva room and into Loki? Weeeeee!

Glorishan

[rylan]

Wasn't there something added a couple days ago so you got a message when someone removes consent? That was pretty cool, but its not there anymore :P

[ssar]

Surely some command that lists all of those consenting to you wouldnt be too hard to implement.

Seems this would be very helpful in many situations.

[Corth]

but.. but..

if cr'ers knew when someone had revoked a consent, they would never die cr'ing and the mud would be too easy for them! [/sarcasm]

Corth
Ex

[Ragorn]

Consent who

- Ragorn

[Magruk Eat Elf]

In response to dragging incap peeps...

Why not just tie them up like you would a criminal and drag them? Don't know if that would work haven't tried it myself. Someone test it out eh?

[Guest]

Currently, unlike follow, the MUD only keeps track of who you are consenting, now who is consenting you.

While this is a good idea, it's not as simple as you would think (well, there's an easy way to do it, inefficient, but not difficult).

No promises, but we'll look at this.

As for when someone revokes their consent, the message should be in now (I did that change a while ago). Did it get overwritten, or is it still in?

[Jegzed]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Kiaransalee:
As for when someone revokes their consent, the message should be in now (I did that change a while ago). Did it get overwritten, or is it still in?</font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Make it bright red ansi

[Jegzed]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Kiaransalee:
While this is a good idea, it's not as simple as you would think (well, there's an easy way to do it, inefficient, but not difficult). </font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Looping through all characters and checking if they consent you and list that could be semi-intensive. However, if you only do it when someone types "consent", then it should not be any problems.

[rylan]

Kia, I think it got overwritten by other code. There was a message when someone revoked consent, then it was gone, then it was in again, and its been gone again for a while :P

[zipalodok]

i posted about some consent thingy awhile ago, then a week later i saw the revoked consents and thought just like rylan , but heres the deal you only see the revoked consent if they consent self, if they consent somebody else you get no message, i'd like message for when they consent someone else, 99% of times i gotta say goofed consents were not because of the person didnt wanna consent u and consented themselves but rather to do something that required consent to someone else.... but yea what dornax was sayin sounds good or just put it under score underneath followers with a list of who consents........

[Kyos]

This is how i implemented consent on another mud.

typing "consent" shows who have consented you and which type of consent:

Mithius - DRAG, GROUP
Bofkar - ALL
Kyos - LOOT


When you consent someone you just do

"consent bofkar group"

to give consent for grouping.

"consent bofkar" (gives full consent to all)

Something similar would be good here i guess... no?

[rylan]

Ahhh zip.. that would explain why I only see the message sometimes!