a lustrous golden-red ring

Sarell · Postby **Sarell** » Sun Aug 01, 2004 5:06 am

a lustrous golden-red ring
Object 'ring lustrous red golden', Item type: WORN
Item can be worn on: FINGER
Item will give you following abilities: NOBITS
Item is: MAGIC NOBURN NO-CLERIC NO-MAGE NOBITS
Weight: 0, Value: 50000
Can affect you as :
Affects : HITROLL By 1
Affects : DAMROLL By 1

a dull golden-red ring
Object 'golden red ring dull', Item type: ARMOR
Item can be worn on: FINGER
Item will give you following abilities: NOBITS
Item is: MAGIC NO-MAGE NOBITS
Weight: 0, Value: 100000
AC-apply is 0
Can affect you as :
Affects : HITROLL By 1
Affects : DAMROLL By 1

Questing the ring makes it !cleric and worth half the value. Should be returned to 1 2 at least.

mynazzaraxxsyn · Postby **mynazzaraxxsyn** » Sun Aug 01, 2004 5:09 am

It also removes the !mage flag and adds the !burn flag. But yeah the quest should do something more then it currently does now.

Tanji Smanji · Postby **Tanji Smanji** » Sun Aug 01, 2004 11:30 am

Been sayin that for ages, something about deaf ears comes to mind.

Delmair Aamoren · Postby **Delmair Aamoren** » Sun Aug 01, 2004 3:31 pm

mynazzaraxxsyn wrote:It also removes the !mage flag and adds the !burn flag. But yeah the quest should do something more then it currently does now.

Looks to me like questing it ADDS the !cleric flag, and ADDS the !burn flag. Doesn't appear toremove the !mage flag. not to mention the quested
version actually has a LOWER plat value than the unquested according to
ID. This ring is broken, and has been since... wipe as far as i can tell.
I can't think of a good reason why this ring shouldn't be at LEAST 1/2.

kiryan · Postby **kiryan** » Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:32 pm

you mean other than being soloable or 2manable and easy to quest?

an obscure quest != a hard quest. make it 2/2 or 0/3 and it'll get quested every boot.

1/2 is the max it should even be considered for and im not convinced it should even be that unless you want to throw quests a bone.

Delmair Aamoren · Postby **Delmair Aamoren** » Tue Aug 03, 2004 12:47 am

You must admit tho, Kiryan, WORSE stats than when it started is hardly warranted.

fotex · Postby **fotex** » Tue Aug 03, 2004 12:51 am

obviously they forgot to dg the dull golden-red ring :(

Sarell · Postby **Sarell** » Tue Aug 03, 2004 11:20 am

What hitter rings are you comparing it to that are so hard Kiryan? I see people wearing gemstones and shiny crimsons a fair bit, darkness is top end and is only 1 fight. What's crimson crystal band now? 2 1? Complete joke to get compared to lusty. Jagged bones? Lusty is the tip of the iceberg in messed up gear atm imho, just found it to be a funny example as you do a quest to make it the same / worse.

kiryan · Postby **kiryan** » Tue Aug 03, 2004 7:14 pm

i agree with you that the whole lusty/dull situation is lame and most likely a mistake as someone mentioned, dull prolly wasnt dgraded. However I question if the difficulty in acquiring the item as well as the difficulty of the ensuing quest is enough to give it the points to justify an upgrade to 1/2. Perhaps making portions of the quest ass load would justify restoring it to gemstone quality.

Tanji Smanji · Postby **Tanji Smanji** » Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:45 pm

kiryan wrote:i agree with you that the whole lusty/dull situation is lame and most likely a mistake as someone mentioned, dull prolly wasnt dgraded. However I question if the difficulty in acquiring the item as well as the difficulty of the ensuing quest is enough to give it the points to justify an upgrade to 1/2. Perhaps making portions of the quest ass load would justify restoring it to gemstone quality.

Aside from the !rent %load item you need to turn into the other %load mob?

Tasan · Postby **Tasan** » Wed Aug 04, 2004 4:27 pm

how anyone can argue that gemstone ring is hard to get is beyond me.

!!x

kiryan · Postby **kiryan** » Thu Aug 05, 2004 8:53 pm

you cant get it solo therefore harder than lusty.

Tasan · Postby **Tasan** » Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:40 am

God I wish that was the real way things worked around here, but you are totally wrong, so... fu schnickens.

Please downgrade every item soloable to more worthless than prior to it's upgrade quest please. Thanx.

!!x

Sarell · Postby **Sarell** » Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:32 am

you can do lots solo in a long time..... doesn't make it not hard

Lusty is pretty hard to solo imho, heaps easier if bring a friend.

Gemstone is hard to solo, but doable, easier if bring a friend, if bring 8 people you can do it in 30 mins with several other items aswell!

Several of the other rings I mentioned can be soloed. I can think of 4/5 rings better than lusty I can solo. Used to be more til downgrade on ruby :P

Have you ever soloed a lusty Kiryan? How did that compare to a crypts run? I find it WAY harder.

Drache · Postby **Drache** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:20 am

After someone gave me this ring in question, I had to bump this thread. Nobody really addressed why it sucks and it's been a long time that this thread's been out

Sarell · Postby **Sarell** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:39 am

good to see some lustrous lusty love resurfacing drache! a classic ring, a sad demise...

Postby **Marthammor** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:25 pm

adjusted stats on the quested ring. likely not what you all were hoping it would be, but still better then it was. should be in soonish.

a lustrous golden-red ring

a lustrous golden-red ring

Who is online